Burning Man organizers eye move to redeveloped mid-Market Street arts district

By 
Hank Drew
SF Public Press
 — Jan 28 2011 - 9:03am

In much the same way as they annually transform a desolate stretch of the Nevada desert into a week-long countercultural art festival, the organizers of Burning Man are now hoping to transform a desolate stretch of San Francisco’s Market Street.

The group that builds a temporary city of more than 40,000 creative vagabonds at the end of each summer is in talks to move into the nine-story early 20th century Warfield Building, at Market Street where Taylor and Sixth streets converge. The building is in the heart of a depressed and crime-ridden three-block zone that San Francisco has been trying to redevelop for years, and is now offering incentives to turn it into cluster of arts organizations.

Marian Goodell, director of business and communications and one of the founders of Burning Man LLC, said the organization has been looking at a number of office spaces on Market Street. She said the Warfield Building in particular has “many characteristics that we like.”

Goodell said the group has also been talking with other arts groups that are looking into the mid-Market area and that an arts renaissance there is imminent.

“We’re willing to go into a neighborhood that no one else really wants and liven it up,” Goodell said. “We’re pretty engaged. I can imagine that whatever a neighborhood might need we would be open to help.”

The group, which has 30 employees and thousands of volunteers who work on a variety of artistic, performance and media projects, would provide foot traffic and a financial boost to retail business in the area.

It would also be a destination that could bring attention to and collaborate with other arts groups moving into the area. The latest, announced earlier this week, is a $100 million theater facility that would be built down the block from the Warfiled. The proposal by the American Conservatory Theater would include a 300-seat theater to augment its Geary Street flagship venue.

Josette Melchor, executive director of Gray Area Foundation for the Arts, which moved into an old porn theater half a block away on Taylor Street in 2009, said her group introduced Burning Man to Warfield owner David Addington.

“I think that having Burning Man here would be amazing,” Melchor said. “I know they are very interested in helping revitalizing the area.”

She said the group has studied how moving into the Warfield could enhance collaborations among the groups.

“They’re extremely excited about the opportunity to do it, and they see the vision,” Melchor said. “But, they have to be careful like everyone.”

Addington provided a terse response over e-mail to inquiries about the Burning Man talks. “It is a possibility,” he wrote. “As is everything else.”

Redevelopment push

San Francisco officials have provided Burning Man with logistical help. Amy Cohen, director of neighborhood Business Development for the city, said the city has actively encouraged Burning Man to move into the area.

“We are interested in anyone who can bring people into the area,” Cohen said. “There is a movement to have Market be an extension of downtown. We see a niche that is developing as a civics-oriented arts district. There’s a lot of entrepreneurial energy moving into this area and Burning Man represents this energy.”

The city’s efforts to revive the forlorn stretch between Fifth and Eighth streets have been slow to gain momentum. Last year Mayor Gavin Newsom announced an $11 million loan fund to encourage arts groups to settle in the zone. But as of last month, only one business — a hamburger restaurant — had taken the city up on the offer. Part of the problem has been that due to restrictions on federal funds, the money must be used to generate new jobs, not just relocate existing ones.

Cohen’s office has conducted walking tours of office spaces in the mid-Market area. She said she will help the group navigate complex city approvals. One way her office could help Burning Man is by speeding up the temporary arts licensing process.

Tomas McCabe, executive director of the Black Rock Arts Foundation, the nonprofit arm of Burning Man, said his group’s main focus is finding places for temporary public art on the street outside the office complex.

“I’m talking large-scale projects,” McCabe said. “One problem that cities have in putting in public art is there’s lots of bureaucracy. And sometimes after years and years of work, nothing happens.”

Temporary public art is meant to be installed for a short time and then either removed or replaced with a different installation.

McCabe used the group’s installation of Hayes Green Temple, a intricately carved wooden structure, at Patricia’s Green in Hayes Valley as a showcase of its public art installation work.

“We worked with the local community and they have started their own arts commission,” he said. “They basically curate that one spot in their park. We were the first ones to place public art there.”

He said the residents became instant art critics and have shown a strong civic interest in what is placed there.

“Its fascinating,” McCabe said. “People might not like a piece but they know it’s going to be in a few months and they can’t wait to see the next one.”

New installations downtown

McCabe said Burning Man is now looking at ways to bring additional temporary public art into the mid-Market area. Last year the city installed several displays in the Warfield and other buildings as part of its Art in Storefronts project to spruce up the street, where dozens of storefronts have sat vacant for years.

“We’re looking at doing some window display art and refurbishing a vacant lot and turning it into a bit of an art park,” McCabe said.

The group was recently named in a National Endowment for the Arts grant to pursue this type urban art initiative.

The Burning Man offices are currently located on the edge of the Bayview district in an anonymous office park near a sewage treatment plant.

“The city would love to see us in the mid-Market area, and we love the idea of moving in there,” McCabe said. “I don’t know if it is going to happen, though it looks like it might happen. We’re already talking about the possibilities of engaging the community and getting art out.”

He said moving out of their current offices and into the heart of the city is essential for public participation. “That’s not really happening in an office park in an industrial neighborhood,” he said.

The group is considering using a storefront in the Warfield Building for a museum and cafe.

“I am not sure what it’s going to look like,” he said. “I know it will add a lot of color to have Burning Man there. People know we are here, but it is going to be really exciting for people to actually see us and know where we are.”

The Warfield Theatre, on the first floor of the Warfield Building, opened in 1922 and has been host to vaudeville shows, jazz artists and bands including the Grateful Dead and U2. Early in the last decade the building was briefly home to the San Francisco Examiner. When Addington bought it he renovated it with the intention of selling whole-floor condominiums ranging from $1.3 million to $2.5 million, with each level guaranteed access to eight tickets to Warfield Theatre productions.

Comments

Any updates on this? Thanks,Greg415-968-6065 

Reads like a area with great potential. Great if the Burning Man office relocation came with some garantees to allow true expansion of the art community in the area. It would be awesome if there were real lenient living space codes so as to create more of a bohemian atmosphere. Do you think mutant vehicles could be parked in the streets?!

I think it is a great idea to have more art locations in that area.
The term redevelopment is inappropriate though as it usually refers to a redevelopment district which takes much of the changing tax base away from public services like mental health and drug treatment that this neighborhood so definitely need. For years there has been a push to make a mid-market redevelopment district that community activist have fought off. A move to have art groups move into many of these empty spaces is such a better idea (especially if it doesn't include a redevelopment district).

GREAT IDEA! Yes, please bring the Burning Man and Black Rock offices to mid-market. What an awesome way to begin redevelopment of a bad neighborhood. DO IT!

Unfortunately, Hank Drew has misconstrued his conversation with me, and he has tried to tape together comments from a variety of people in order to turn it into a non-existent announcement about our move of our offices to the Warfield in the Mid-Market district of San Francisco.

Burning Man has made no agreement to move anywhere, but we are very interested in that neighborhood. We can't move while we're in production for the desert event, and at this point we are very close to being in the window of full production and not in "move" mode.

I have personally looked at about 7 spaces on Market Street and about 24 within a few blocks of 6th and Market. The Mayor's office did encourage us to move there, and Josette Melchor, also a Burner, introduced us to David Addington. I have also met the owners of several other buildings in the neighborhood.

And, regarding the person who says we're in the "Dogpatch" neighborhood and doubts our offices are near a wastewater treatment plant? We left Dogpatch nearly 2 years ago when UCSF bought our building and tore it down. We've been located at 3450 Third Street @ Evans and very near a Wastewater Treatment plant since then.

The article made no mention of any official "announcement" or "agreement" of a move to the Warfield Building. We were careful to make sure to note that this was one option among several and that nothing was imminent. At the same time, most readers had no idea that this was being considered to we thought the possibility that this might happen was newsworthy. It is also an important edition to the story to get more details on the possible timing of a move due to the Burning Man event schedule.

The article made no mention of any official "announcement" or "agreement" of a move to the Warfield Building. We were careful to make sure to note that this was one option among several and that nothing was imminent. At the same time, most readers had no idea that this was being considered so we thought the possibility that this might happen was newsworthy. It is also an important addition to the story to get more details on the possible timing of a move due to the Burning Man event schedule.

yes, Hank. I realize that you were careful not to indicate something was imminent. However, the tone walked the line close enough so that other news agencies picked it up and said we'd "made an announcement" and 2 called for comment. So, it's a thin line. Such is life in the media business I'm sure. ;-)

not in bayview by a treatment plant !! sympathy ploy ??? burning man office is in Dogpatch off of 3rd Street...

Commercial Loft Spaces available for Creative Artist!
923 Market Street, nx to 901 Market St, Vacant 4-story Building, Double Height Ceiling, Brick Walls & Exposed Steel Columns, Clear Span Floor Plan.

Contact: George 415 668-7700

They're not talking about moving Burning Man from Nevada to SF. Just their offices.

I doubt that this will happen. The problem is that the festival has become such a worldwide phenomenon that San Francisco, from its residents all the way down through its city government would balk at having 40,000 people gather at one area for an extended weekend at Mid-Market.

Just like what happened to Exotic Erotic when it was moved out of San Francisco and put into Richmond, you may find that moving Burning Man back to San Francisco may wind up killing this festival.

While it was out there on the Playa, Burning Man had the chance to thrive and become more than what it was when it was held back on Baker Beach in its early days. Nowadays, the spirit of that festival, if moved back to San Francisco, would probably be squelched because the festival participants would be limited in where they would go and what they could do.

The discussion is for Burning Man's office space--where 30ish people work year-round on producing the festival, and where dozens of volunteers may gather to work on projects and have meetings. The most would be a couple hundred, I think--nowhere near 40,000!!!!
But, each department has meetings for volunteers, many of which are monthly, from February through August. THAT, along with a daily workforce of 30, would bring foot traffic to the area.
I think it would be neat if this happened--then I could take public transit to that near-monthly meeting, rather than having to drive, or be on MUNI for over an hour to get to their current location. I might be likely to try that hamburger place, too.

Did you read the article? Its not about having Burning Man in SF, just the organizers moving office.

I don't think the idea is to bring Burning Man back to SF. I think the idea is for Burning Man, LLC to bring art installations and gatherings, on a much smaller scale and on a more regular basis, to this part of Market St. This would hopefully aide in revitalizing the area and allow for other businesses to want to be a part of that then thriving neighborhood.

They're NOT talking about moving the festival to market street, buddy!!!! HAHA!! Michael, Try reading the article one more time.

Uh, Michael, I think you mis-read the article. Burning Man, the ORGANIZATION, is considering moving its OFFICES to mid-Market. Not considering moving the Playa to the Warfield building.

Um. Obviously, you didn't read the entire article. The Burning Man festival itself won't be moving into downtown SF. Just the offices of the Burning Man organization and it's non-profit arts foundation.

Mid market is hardly a redeveloped area. This area need help from public health and police. The arts are only part of the solution. Come on government departments, start talking to eachother and get all of the drugdealers and drugusers off the street

you are kidding, aren't you ?