Behind the protest signs: The voices of Occupy San Francisco

SF Public Press
 — Oct 20 2011 - 9:05am

“I think we’re witnessing possibly the biggest left populist rebellion since the populist movement of the 1890s.”

On a recent warm early morning in downtown San Francisco, veteran organizer David Solnit uttered those hopeful words amid a boisterous crowd of about 400 marching through the Financial District demanding banks pay for the economic and human costs of the home foreclosure crisis.

The Oct. 12 protest temporarily shut down Wells Fargo headquarters on Montgomery Street, leading to 11 arrests as demonstrators from a coalition of labor and community-based groups, including affordable housing and immigrants’ rights movements and the Occupy San Francisco movement spent five hours rallying to “foreclose on Wall Street West.”

Beyond the slogans and chants, what is this occupation movement about and why is it catching like wildfire? What do the growing ranks of Occupy Wall Street/San Francisco/fill-in-the-blank hope comes of this tempest of progressivism?

Since a handful of protesters “occupied” Wall Street in mid-September to protest corporate power and economic inequalities, an international movement of sorts has risen up, with marches and encampments in hundreds of U.S. cities and towns and protests across the globe. Last Saturday, protesters in more than 900 cities throughout Europe, Africa and Asia rallied in sympathy with their American counterparts, The Washington Post reported.

“I’ve never seen anything like this in my life,” said Canadian author and social activist Naomi Klein in an interview at the Wells Fargo rally in San Francisco. “People are so excited to have a new tent in which to meet, and the possibility of it expanding limitlessly. Political courage is so contagious.”

In a speech to the crowd, Klein said, “This is an incredible moment in this country. It turns out there is a lot of latent radicalism just waiting to be woken up. There are way more of us than we thought.”

Of course, not everyone is onboard. At the Wells Fargo protest, bank employees stood on the fringes of the boisterous rally waiting to get inside to work. Some expressed resentment that their entrance was being blocked. A couple of employees whispered their support for the message, if not the occupation of their workplace. Another said the protesters were “misinformed” about the economy and should “just get a job.” Some media critics have decried a lack of focus or coordination to the varied protests.

Culture of consensus

But at the core of the Occupy movement, participants said, lies a democratic culture of consensus that is as important as any list of demands.

Solnit, a veteran organizer who helped mobilize protests against the WTO in Seattle in 1999, said the movement is “very horizontal and open, and they have created a space where huge numbers of people feel comfortable and have ownership.

“There’s not some board of directors or paid staff person running everything,” he said. “There is a process of direct democracy in the face of a failed democracy.”

Numerous Occupy San Francisco backers said they were drawn by the chance to create a culture in which everyone could speak and be heard.

“It’s leaderless, it’s spontaneous — that’s what I love about it,” said protester Robyn Kralique, who wants to help create a “sacred, safe open space where we can discuss the possibilities together and actually have a say and democracy, even if it’s just a block of people having free discussion and say about their politics. In America the average person doesn’t get their say, because it’s controlled by money.”

Charmz Valentino, who came to the city for the Hardly Strictly Bluegrass festival and has since hunkered down with her dog at Occupy San Francisco, said, “It’s so amazing that there is such a large range of ages, occupations and views, and we are all coming together to support our consensus.” Asked how long she planned on staying, Valentino, 26, said, “This is an indefinite occupation, and I will be here indefinitely.”

Jeff Weiss, a 33-year-old cafe worker who lives in San Francisco on “minimum wage, plus tips,” said he was inspired by “people coming together, communicating face to face, sharing ideas, ironing out those ideas and deciding collectively what’s in the best interests of all of us for the best possible intentions.”

Grievances — and proposals

Still, the question remains: What are those intentions? There is no single list of demands, but protesters have plenty of ideas about what is propelling the movement, and what they want changed. In dozens of interviews, their answers ranged from radical challenges to capitalism as a system to reformist proposals for corporate transparency and “fair taxation” of wealth.

The clarion call of “We are the 99 percent” has driven home a blaring message about what protesters argue is a host of inequalities — of wealth, income, education, housing, economic opportunity, political clout, access to decent food and healthcare, and much more. Some protesters want to see corporate economic and political power reined in and others call for capitalism to be reformed, transformed or replaced. Proposals include enforcing existing regulations on corporate finance, breaking up corporate bank chains, creating a city-run municipal bank or expanding off-the-grid barter economies and alternative currencies.

“A lot of things could be fixed if we provided free housing at every level, free education at every level, free health care for every level,” said Valentino, whose puppy sported an “Occupy SF” button. “I am not comfortable with the fact that the Federal Reserve is owned by a private corporation. I would like to see that turned around as well. We need a big change in our financial institutions.”

Ken Tray, a teacher and union leader with United Educators of San Francisco, added: “If there is a clear message here, it’s that there is a radical redistribution of wealth upward, and it’s beginning to hurt people on the ground. I think the message is the rich have to pay their fair share and the public sector is something worth defending.”

Despite working in a job “related to the financial industry,” Mike, a clean-cut 40ish man who would not give his last name, joined the protests in front of the Federal Reserve building. “Banks got priority treatment and the rest of us, the 99 percent, got the recession,” he said, holding a sign at the corner of Market and Main streets. “I’m not against their existence, I’m against the idea that we should be subservient to them. They should be serving us.” Mike’s proposal: “I’d like to see a strengthening of the regulatory environment to keep another recession from happening. The best way to do that is to break up the banks. I’d also like to see a strong Volcker Rule — make sure they can’t use our money to gamble for their own profits.”

Asked what drew him into the streets, 52 year-old Francis Walsh, an assistant special education teacher from Daly City, said: “It’s right here in the sign — end the wars, tax the rich, care for the people and protect the environment. Four simple ideas, not easy to do, but the simplicity of it and the message behind it is what brought me out here.”

Walsh said he hoped for “a steady building activism moving toward a more equitable society, moving toward a better redistribution of the goods and services that we have and the financial power that we have. The skewed finances that we have, popularized by the 1 percent controlling the 99 percent, is ruinous for all, and actually will be ruinous for the people at the top as well.” Walsh said he did not know if his vision would materialize anytime soon, “but if people don’t speak out, if people don’t march, it never will.”

‘Something completely new’

Many of the protesters called for something beyond reform. “The issue goes beyond our government is messed up,” said Lauren Phillips, a 23 year-old San Francisco City College student who is taking time off from her studies because “there is traveling to be done, and revolution to make.”

Phillips, who has been camping and protesting for weeks, said it’s about more than just the economy: “If we don’t have an environment to prosper in, there is certainly not going to be prosperity anymore — there won’t be any people left to prosper if there is no environment in which to have health. That’s why this thing is so big and so hard to define, why we don’t necessarily have the answer of what to call it. I think it needs to be something completely new.”

Calls by the news media for a unified policy platform frustrated many protesters, who said it would only narrow the discussion they are trying to open up.

Desean Ricardo, a dread-haired rap musician who came from Pinole to protest along with his wife and baby daughter, explained: “The mainstream media keeps asking us for our list of demands, but that’s kind of trapping the movement in a corner. They want to hear our fixes to the system, but the system can’t be fixed.”

Some protesters pointed the finger at capitalism itself — arguing it should be replaced or dramatically amended.

In her speech in front of Wells Fargo, Klein argued, “Capitalism destroys the systems on which it depends, it destroys the people who can no longer afford to buy its products, it destroys the rivers and the air. This is an insane model and it has to stop.”

Walsh, the special education teacher, said capitalism is undermining itself.

“Capitalism is riven with contradictions,” he said, “and I think the contradiction that’s going on here is, the more you skew the income and property ownership to a small number of people, the more the system actually ends up destroying itself. If the people at the bottom aren’t well off — they don’t spend money, they don’t have jobs, they don’t get the services — eventually that starts working its way up and starts eating away at the people who benefit at the moment.”

Capitalism ‘an unsustainable model’

“Plato,” 24, a self-described “anarchist at heart,” argued capitalism is “an unsustainable model because it depends on growth. It has to keep producing more value just to repay debt … exponential growth is unsustainable in a planet of limited resources.” Like other younger protesters interviewed, he advocated alternative currency systems and new cultures of barter and sharing as a partial remedy.

Regardless of what “ism” they endorsed, for many embracing Occupy San Francisco, the simple chance to speak their minds without media or political filters was a victory.

“The most important thing is that the dialogue is no longer being controlled by the news,” said Jason Ohdner, a nurse from Phoenix who came to help train street medics and support the protests here. “They don’t have to let external forces decide for them which words are going to be bad words, so people are standing up and saying words like socialism, and they are not flinching.”

Some spoke of a cultural shift that goes beyond lawmaking. “I think what we're trying to do here is more than just change a few laws and end the Fed, but at the same time create a new kind of culture and community where people love,” said Phillips. “It’s about bringing people back together in conscious community, practicing that and showing that it's possible, that people can love and engage thy neighbor.”

For Kralique and others interviewed, the movement goes beyond a list of demands.

“There are just so many demands, because there are so many crises going on right now that it’s hard to boil it down to one cohesive statement,” she said. “I don’t even think we should be forced to do that. We should be able to band together and discuss the possibilities.”


Our demands?We demand to Live rent free in the priciest real estate in the United States while we smoke pot all day and eat free catered food.Occupy Wall Street has the only chance of actually getting something done, but as its half-million dollar  budget is now controlled by the labor unions and will probably just be used to buy TV time in the next election cycle.

yeah, all that fantasy wish-fulfillment thinking is extremely childish at best. However, there is injustice in our system, which is NOT really capitalism - it is corporatism, or an unholy alliance between government and some businesses, and certainly the major banks. It is not a free market by any means - these people would do well to learn the differnece between free markets and the corrupted crony-cap system we have going now. We need to go back to a free market, by first repealing the Fed Reserve act, which funds all the corruption, and let people see what real freedom can produce!

This is another fad that will go the way of the pokemon.

George, San Francisco;

Immense kudos to you for the brilliant, well-thought-out, articulate essay that I concur with immensely and wish I possessed the ability to create!!!!!!!!!

I am going to copy and paste your comment so others can be aware of it.

A mere link, I fear, will eventually lead to an "URL not found" or that the page is defunct or whatever.

Your brilliant message deserves to exist as long as possible.'

I am unsure where to paste your essay (that will be attributed to George of San Francisco and will show the URL to this page) and will be posted on a blog where I have NO profit to me set-up.

Thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge and doing so in a manner so understandable!!!!


And "Thanks" to SF Public Press for offering a venue for your writing to appear!!!

 An excellent article, Chris!

Keeping the main goals of OWS broad -- like achieving a much better balance in wealth distribution -- is excellent strategic thinking. But in addition to these main broad goals should be some more specific secondary goals, like geting unemployment down to say 4%. And one way to do this quickly is to demand a Balance of Trade. Millions of jobs have been sent out of the country by large International Corporations. This has resulted in a yearly trade imbalance of $500 to $700 Billion every year. If President Obama declared an emergency and immediately imposed and enforced a Balance of Trade, this would create 10 to 20 Million new permanent jobs in the U.S. and they could be in place in a few weeks and months (if each job pays $50K, then $500B÷ 50K = 10 Million JOBS) Let's put a BALANCE OF TRADE high on the list of 100 demands.

We don't need these yet. But keep them close.

Christopher D. Cook: creating a city-run municipal bank or expanding off-the-grid barter economies and alternative currenciesJct: That's 4 times community currencies have been proposed! Occupy Toronto, Occupy Newfoundland, Occupy Albany and now Occupy San Francisco see the alternative money as a solution. Maybe it's time for a global Occupy Wallets  with our own barter currency time! I'm keeping track at my wall where I'm cross-posting this Number Four! I remember laughing at California during Governor Girlieman's term and posting it in hundreds of sites: Jct: When Argentina's government workers were faced with cuts, their unions talked 6 states into paying them with small-denomination state bonds which could be used to pay for state services and taxes and which everyone accepted as useful currency. Too bad unions of U.S. government workers don't take bond money too. Governor Girlieman Schwarzenegger  being shown up by Governor Machoman Romero. Finally, I'm not waiting. I've already set up my own personal online P2P timebank account at my facebook page listing my Offers, Wants, Hours Given, Hours Received. In 1999, I paid for 39/40 nights in Europe with a timebank IOU for a night back in Canada worth 5 Hours. I'll take yours if you'll take my IOUs for time. Good ID is all that's need to qualify for the underground economy. Find UNISET UNILETS. 

Speaking as a former history professor, these few thoughts on the subject, if I may:

Of course we need a new paradigm. Unfortunately, it’s not going to happen until the present one dies. Why? Well, aside from being the way things seem to work, because everyone who’s in charge of trying to fix the mess we’re in (and “fix” may be the real operative word here) are all products of it; they come from the same class mold, went to the same schools, believe (and so see things) the same way, etc. It’s impossible for them to think outside the box. As Einstein well noted: “No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” As Darwin observed, that which cannot change-adapt (evolve) becomes extinct.

To make our situation even more absurd, virtually all of those in charge not only do not want to change; they have no genuine intention of changing. They are utterly cynical and disingenuous, and whatever it takes to maintain the status quo will be done, even if it’s ultimately suicidal (the end is still in the future, boys, let’s steal everything we can now). Voltaire was right: “As long as people continue to believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities.”

Alas, Machiavelli was right, too. The “Real World Golden Rule” is, those who have the gold make the rule. No secret, money buys power. Our real problem, as Lord Acton famously said: “And remember, where you have a concentration of power in a few hands, all too frequently men with the mentality of gangsters get control. History has proven that. All power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.” We have perverted our political-economic system into a circus of demagogues paid for by an elite class of criminals who are masters of deception. As Joseph Goebbels said with chilling truth: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”


What can be said of these people? Well, this can be said of us all to some extent, but it applies virtually one-hundred percent to all those who really own and run things, notwithstanding their espoused politics, religion, etc.:

“…They are not beautiful: they are only decorated. They are not clean: they are only shaved and starched. They are not dignified: they are only fashionably dressed. They are not educated they are only college passmen. They are not religious: they are only pewrenters. They are not moral: they are only conventional. They are not virtuous: they are only cowardly. They are not even vicious: they are only ’frail.’ They are not artistic: they are only lascivious. They are not prosperous: they are only rich. They are not loyal, they are only servile; not dutiful, only sheepish; not public spirited, only patriotic; not courageous, only quarrelsome; not determined, only obstinate; not masterful, only domineering; not self-controlled, only obtuse; not self-respecting, only vain; not kind, only sentimental; not social, only gregarious; not considerate, only polite; not intelligent, only opinionated; not progressive, only factious; not imaginative, only superstitious; not just, only vindictive; not generous, only propitiatory; not disciplined, only cowed; and not truthful at all--liars every one of them, to the very backbone of their souls.” [sic] – G.B. Shaw (from Man and Superman

Sic Transit Gloria Mundi...

George, San Francisco

I wish you had been my professor.

Good stuff! Well worth the donations!~ Eric B