The Public Press is meeting with neighborhood groups in San Francisco. Can we talk to you?

Drivers take the heat for discontent of Muni riders

SF Public Press
 — Nov 18 2010 - 11:48am

Proposition G, the initiative that voters overwhelmingly approved to change pay and work rules for Muni operators, focused attention on the system’s drivers, painting them as a reason that San Francisco’s Muni transit system is notoriously slow and unreliable.

And the drivers did little to help their cause on the public relations front — rejecting cuts that other city workers agreed to, boycotting the annual Cable Car Bell Ringing Contest and threatening to strike if the measure passed.

But on the job, drivers work in a high-stress environment, with long hours and, for many drivers, few breaks.

“We are on the front line,” said Emmanuel Andreas, 47, a Muni driver for 11 years who drives the 33-Stanyan bus. “Whatever happens with Muni, the drivers feel squeezed between the management and the union and the public.”

Muni operators also encounter violent situations at work.

The transit agency recorded 98 assaults on operators for fiscal year 2010, and documented 45 threats on operators.

In addition, the problems they contend with — faulty equipment and daily changes in traffic conditions that interfere with their ability to ensure on-time performance — are largely out of their hands.

On a recent day on the 28-19th Avenue line, the driver was running late because of construction on 19th Avenue. By the time the bus arrived at the end of the line at Fort Mason, the driver had only a few minutes to stretch her legs before she had to re-board the bus to head to Daly City BART.

It was not nearly enough time to eat lunch (which, if she did while inside the bus, would be one of a slew of rule violations), and not enough time to go to the bathroom without risking beginning her route already late. When the bus rolled into Daly City BART, the driver immediately picked up the waiting passengers and was again back on her route with no break.

Adding to the stress is the punishment that drivers who get behind schedule face. Myron Fong, a supervisor with 20 years’ experience driving a bus in his 30 years with Muni, said drivers who are late on their runs get a warning each time. After three warnings, “the driver would go to retraining.”

Fong said drivers also face stiff penalties for uniform violations. “The first one could be a warning. The second one could be a suspension day without pay,” he said.

That stress takes a toll on the health of drivers. A series of studies in the late 1990s uncovered high instances of high blood pressure, diabetes and other stress-related diseases among transit operators.

A version of this article was published in the fall 2010 edition of the San Francisco Public Press newspaper. Read select stories online, or buy a copy.

This story was made possible with funding through micro-donations via Spot.Us.

Comments

Of course drivers take the brunt of public discontent, because that's who the public sees on a daily basis. Some drivers are overtly rude, although the majority are not.
The economic downturn has made sweetheart wage guarantees like the one addressed by Prop G seem unreasonable to most people. I think that's what passed Prop G, and not rider's anger towards the drivers themselves.
And, I bet obesity is more to blame than job stress for the driver's hypertension and diabetes. Most of them are terribly FAT.

But how often are we willing to step back and say thank you for the great muni drivers? The ones who announce every stop, or whistle while they're driving along their route? It's stressful to drive in SF and even more so when you're driving the same route over and over with the crazies that wander on and off, not to mention fair evaders. And muni drivers come in all shapes and sizes, so chill off your FAT accusations.